AD 2000-11-05
Applicability
| Type | Manufacturer | Model | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| aircraft | Air Tractor Inc. | AT-301 | Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor Incorporated Models AT-301, AT-401, and AT-501 Airplanes |
| aircraft | Air Tractor Inc. | AT-401 | Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor Incorporated Models AT-301, AT-401, and AT-501 Airplanes |
| aircraft | Air Tractor Inc. | AT-501 | Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor Incorporated Models AT-301, AT-401, and AT-501 Airplanes |
Unsafe Condition
Fatigue cracking of the vertical fin front spar attachment fittings, if not detected and corrected, could result in structural failure of the front spar and consequently the rear spar. This could lead to loss of directional control and eventual loss of airplane control.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Required Actions
Repetitively inspect the vertical fin front spar attachment fittings for fatigue cracks. Rework the vertical fin if any cracks are found. Discontinue repetitive inspections after reworking the vertical fin.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Compliance Time
Within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) from the effective date.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Affected Aircraft
Air Tractor Incorporated Models AT-301 (serial numbers 301-0100 through 301-0736), AT-401 (serial numbers 401-0662 through 401-0736), and AT-501 (serial numbers 501-0002 through 501-0030), equipped with a 3/16-inch thick aluminum fin front spar fitting and an all metal rudder.
AI-generated summary from the source AD text. Verify against the official source before acting.
Federal Register Abstract
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Air Tractor Incorporated (Air Tractor) Models AT- 301, AT-401, and AT-501 airplanes that are equipped with a \\3/16\\-inch thick aluminum fin front spar fitting and an all metal rudder. This AD requires that you repetitively inspect the vertical fin front spar attachment fittings for fatigue cracks, and rework the vertical fin if any cracks are found. This AD is the result of reports of a vertical fin front spar fitting failure on a Model AT-401 airplane. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct cracks in the vertical fin front spar attachment fittings, which could result in failure of the vertical fin. This condition could lead to loss of directional control and eventual loss of airplane control.
Document Text
Show stored source text (verify against official source)
[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 107 (Friday, June 2, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35267-35270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [<a href="http://www.gpo.gov">www.gpo.gov</a>]
[FR Doc No: 00-13445]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 2000-CE-21-AD; Amendment 39-11753; AD 2000-11-05]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor Incorporated Models AT-301,
AT-401, and AT-501 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that
applies to certain Air Tractor Incorporated (Air Tractor) Models AT-
301, AT-401, and AT-501 airplanes that are equipped with a \3/16\-inch
thick aluminum fin front spar fitting and an all metal rudder. This AD
requires that you repetitively inspect the vertical fin front spar
attachment fittings for fatigue cracks, and rework the vertical fin if
any cracks are found. This AD is the result of reports of a vertical
fin front spar fitting failure on a Model AT-401 airplane. The actions
specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct cracks in the
vertical fin front spar attachment fittings, which could result in
failure of the vertical fin. This condition could lead to loss of
directional control and eventual loss of airplane control.
DATES: This AD becomes effective on June 23, 2000.
The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of Snow Engineering Company Service Letter
#138, Revised August 7, 1996, as of August 25, 1997.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Snow Engineering Company Service Letter #196, Revised
March 7, 2000, as of June 23, 2000.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive any comments
on this rule on or before July 28, 2000.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to FAA, Central Region, Office
of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-CE-21-AD, 901
Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
You may get the service information referenced in this AD from Air
Tractor Incorporated, P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374. You may examine
this information at FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-CE-21-AD, 901 Locust, Room
506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal
Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Romero, Aerospace Engineer,
Airplane Certification Office, FAA, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth,
Texas 76137; telephone: (817) 222-5102; facsimile: (817) 222-5960.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
What events have caused this AD? The FAA has received a report of
an incident involving an Air Tractor Model AT-401 airplane. The
following describe this incident:
1. The vertical fin front spar plate cracked and caused failure of
the vertical fin front spar fitting;
2. The rear spar consequently failed and the fin contacted the
elevator, which caused difficulty in controlling the airplane; and
3. The front spar failure occurred in the \3/16\-inch thick
aluminum fin front spar fitting across one of the bolt holes where the
fitting attaches to the fuselage frame.
[[Page 35268]]
What are the consequences if the condition is not corrected?
Fatigue cracking of the vertical fin front spar attachment fittings, if
not detected and corrected, could result in structural failure of the
front spar and consequently the rear spar. This could result in loss of
directional control and loss of control of the airplane.
Is there service information that applies to this subject? Snow
Engineering Company has issued the following service information that
relates to this subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service letter # Issue/revision dates Procedures for
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Service Letter #196......... Issued February 9, Reworking the
2000; Revised March vertical fin.
7, 2000.
Service Letter #138......... Issued July 29, Repetitively
1995; Revised inspecting the
August 7, 1996. vertical fin front
spar attachment
fittings for
fatigue cracks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA's Determination and an Explanation of the Provisions of the
AD
What has FAA decided? After examining the circumstances and
reviewing all available information related to the incidents described
above, including the relevant service information, we determined that:
--An unsafe condition exists or could develop on certain Air Tractor
Models AT-301, AT-401, and AT-501 airplanes of the same type design to
the incident airplane that are equipped with a \3/16\-inch thick
aluminum fin front spar fitting and an all metal rudder; and
--AD action should be taken in order to detect and correct cracks in
the vertical fin front spar attachment fittings, which could result in
failure of the vertical fin. This condition could lead to loss of
directional control and eventual loss of airplane control.
What does this AD require? This AD requires you to:
1. repetitively inspect vertical fin front spar attachment fittings
for fatigue cracks; and
2. rework the vertical fin if any cracks are found.
Once you rework the vertical fin, you may discontinue the
repetitive inspections.
The applicability of Snow Engineering Company Service Letter #138
refers to different airplanes than are referenced in this AD action. AD
97-14-05, Amendment 39-10063 (62 FR 38445, July 18, 1997), covers the
airplanes referenced in Service Letter #138. The inspection procedures
also apply for the airplanes referenced in this AD action. Therefore,
Snow Engineering Company Service Letter #138 also applies to this AD,
as well as AD 97-14-05. This service letter also specifies repetitive
inspection intervals of 25 hours time-in-service (TIS). Paragraph
(d)(2) of this AD requires the repetitive inspections at 100 hours TIS.
Will I have the opportunity to comment prior to the issuance of the
rule? Because the unsafe condition described in this document could
result in loss of directional control and eventual loss of airplane
control, FAA finds that notice and opportunity for public prior comment
are impracticable. Therefore, good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not
preceded by notice and opportunity for public comment, FAA invites
comments on this rule. You may submit whatever written data, views, or
arguments you choose. You need to include the rule's docket number and
submit your comments in triplicate to the address specified under the
caption ADDRESSES. The FAA will consider all comments received on or
before the closing date. We may amend this rule in light of comments
received. Factual information that supports your ideas and suggestions
is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action
and determining whether we need to take additional rulemaking action.
The FAA is re-examining the writing style we currently use in
regulatory documents, in response to the Presidential memorandum of
June 1, 1998. That memorandum requires federal agencies to communicate
more clearly with the public. We are interested in your comments on
whether the style of this document is clearer, and any other
suggestions you might have to improve the clarity of FAA communications
that affect you. You can get more information about the Presidential
memorandum and the plain language initiative at <a href="http://www.plainlanguage.gov">http://www.plainlanguage.gov</a>.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might
suggest a need to modify the rule. You may examine all comments we
receive before and after the closing date of the rule in the Rules
Docket. We will file a report in the Rules Docket that summarizes each
FAA contact with the public that concerns the substantive parts of this
AD.
If you want us to acknowledge the receipt of your comments, you
must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard. On the postcard, write
``Comments to Docket No. 2000-CE-21-AD.'' We will date stamp and mail
the postcard back to you.
Regulatory Impact
These regulations will not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, FAA has determined that this
final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency
regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe
condition in aircraft, and is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. We have determined that this action involves an
emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If FAA determines that this emergency
regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures, we will prepare a final regulatory evaluation. You may
obtain a copy of the evaluation (if required) from the Rules Docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 35269]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends Section 39.13 by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD) to read as follows:
2000-11-05 Air Tractor Incorporated: Amendment 39-11753; Docket No.
2000-CE-21-AD.
(a) What airplanes are affected by this AD? The following
airplane models and serial numbers that are:
(1) Certificated in any category; and
(2) Equipped with a \3/16\-inch fin front spar fitting and an
all metal rudder.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Models Serial numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT-301.................................... 301-0100 through 301-0736
AT-401.................................... 401-0662 through 401-0736
AT-501.................................... 501-0002 through 501-0030
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: This AD does not affect the requirements of AD 97-14-05,
Amendment 39-10063 (62 FR 38445, July 18, 1997). AD 97-14-05
requires similar actions to this AD on Models AT-302, AT-400, AT-
400A airplanes, and certain Models AT301, AT-401, and AT-501
airplanes that are not affected by this AD.
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate
any of the above airplanes on the U.S. Register.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions required by
this AD are intended to detect and correct cracks in the spar
plates, which could result in failure of the vertical fin. This
condition could lead to loss of directional control and eventual
loss of control of the airplane.
(d) What must I do to address this problem? To address this
problem, you must accomplish the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Compliance time Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Initial inspection of the At whichever of Accomplish in
fin front spar attachment the following accordance with
fittings for fatigue cracks. that occurs later. the Inspection
(i) Upon Requirements
accumulating section of Snow
4,000 hours time- Engineering
in-service (TIS); Company Service
or,. Letter #138,
(ii) Within the Issued July 29,
next 25 hours TIS 1995; Revised
after the June August 7, 1996.
23, 2000 (the
effective date of
this AD).
(2) Repetitive inspections of Within 100 hours Accomplish in
the fin front spar attachment TIS after the accordance with
fittings. Repetitive inspection initial the Inspection
requirement only applies if no inspection and Requirements
cracks are found and you choose thereafter at section of Snow
not to rework the fin front intervals not to Engineering
spar attachment. exceed 100 hours Company Service
TIS if you have Letter #138,
no cracks and Issued July 29,
choose not to 1995; Revised
rework the fin August 7, 1996.
front spar
attachment.
(3) Rework the fin front spar (i) Prior to Accomplish in
attachment fittings. further flight accordance with
after any the Vertical Fin
inspection where Rework
a crack is found Instructions
in the front or section of Snow
rear spar area. Engineering
(ii) This Company Service
eliminates the letter #196,
repetitive Issued February
inspection 9, 2000; Revised
requirement of March 7, 2000.
this AD.
(4) Optional rework of the fin Any time to Accomplish in
front spar attachment fittings. eliminate the accordance with
repetitive the Vertical Fin
inspection Rework
requirement of Instructions
this AD. section of Snow
Engineering
Company Service
Letter #196,
Issued February
9, 2000; Revised
March 7, 2000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: The applicability of Snow Engineering Company Service
Letter #138 refers to different airplanes than are referenced in
this document. AD 97-14-05, Amendment 39-10063 (62 FR 38445, July
18, 1997), covers the airplanes referenced in Snow Engineering
Company Service Letter #138. The inspection procedures also apply
for the airplanes referenced in this AD. Therefore, Snow Engineering
Company Service Letter #138 also applies to this AD, as well as AD
97-14-05. This service letter also specifies repetitive inspection
intervals of 25 hours TIS. Paragraph (d)(2) of this AD requires the
repetitive inspections at 100 hours TIS.
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way? You may use an
alternative method of compliance or adjust the compliance time if:
(1) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent
level of safety; and
(2) The Manager, Fort Worth Airplane Certification Office (ACO),
approves your alternative. Submit your request through an FAA
Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send
it to the Manager, Fort Worth ACO.
Note: This AD applies to each airplane identified in paragraph
(a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered,
or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For
airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the
performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/
operator must request approval for an alternative method of
compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request
should include an assessment of the effect of the modification,
alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD;
and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe condition, specify
actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already-approved
alternative methods of compliance? Contact Rob Romero, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Fort Worth ACO, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth,
Texas 76193-0150; telephone: (817) 222-5102; facsimile: (817) 222-
5960.
(g) What if I need to fly the airplane to another location to
comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your airplane to a location where
you can accomplish the requirements of this AD.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by
reference? You must accomplish the actions required by this AD in
accordance with Snow Engineering Company Service Letter #138,
Revised August 7, 1996, and Snow Engineering Company Service Letter
#196, Revised March 7, 2000.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by
[[Page 35270]]
reference of Snow Engineering Company Service Letter #138, Revised
August 7, 1996, as of August 25, 1997.
(2) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Snow Engineering Company Service
Letter #196, Revised March 7, 2000 under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(3) You may get copies from Air Tractor Incorporated, P.O. Box
485, Olney, Texas 76374. You may look at copies at FAA, Central
Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas
City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North
Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
(i) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment
becomes effective on June 23, 2000.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 22, 2000.
Marvin R. Nuss,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 00-13445 Filed 6-1-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
Source: Official FAA Source ↗
Retrieved: Apr 6, 2026
Rights: U.S. Government Public Domain
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FAA. Always verify with official sources.