9 ADs indexed for Airbus Canada Limited Partnership | Airbus SAS | The Boeing Company | De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited | Kidde Aerospace & Defense | MHI RJ Aviation ULC | Saab AB, Saab Aeronautics | Yaborã Indústria Aeronáutica S.A. aircraft.
Airworthiness Directives; Kidde Aerospace & Defense
Unsafe Condition: certain cargo fire extinguisher halon bottles installed in the cargo compartment had low charge pressure
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Kidde Aerospace & Defense
Airworthiness Directives; Siemens S.A.S. Smoke Detectors
Unsafe Condition: Smoke detectors P/N PMC1102-02 failed an acceptance test due to significant degraded optical sensitivity, caused by abnormally degraded light-emitting diodes (LEDs).
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Siemens S.A.S. Smoke Detectors
Airworthiness Directives; Zodiac Seats France (Formerly Sicma Aero Seat) Passenger Seat Assemblies
Unsafe Condition: Cracks in the backrest links, which could affect the structural integrity of seat backrests. Failure of the backrest links could result in injury to an occupant during emergency landing conditions.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Zodiac Seats France (Formerly Sicma Aero Seat) Passenger Seat Assemblies
Airworthiness Directives; Rockwell Collins, Inc. Transponders
Unsafe Condition: The TPR-720 and TPR-900 Mode S transponders respond intermittently to Mode S interrogations from both ground-based and traffic collision avoidance system (TCAS-) equipped airplanes.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Rockwell Collins, Inc. Transponders
Airworthiness Directives; Koito Industries, Ltd., Seats and Seating Systems Approved Under Technical Standard Order (TSO) TSO-C39b, TSO-C39c, or TSO-C127a
Unsafe Condition: Seats and seating systems may not meet certain flammability, static strength, and dynamic strength criteria. Failure to meet static and dynamic strength criteria could result in injuries during eme...
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Koito Industries, Ltd., Seats and Seating Systems Approved Under Technical Standard Order (TSO) TSO-C39b, TSO-C39c, or TSO-C127a
Airworthiness Directives; Various Transport Category Airplanes Equipped With Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Installed in Accordance With Certain Supplemental Type Certificates
Unsafe Condition: Potential ignition sources inside fuel tanks, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Various Transport Category Airplanes Equipped With Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Installed in Accordance With Certain Supplemental Type Certificates
Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International (formerly AlliedSignal Inc.) 36-300(A), 36-280(B), and 36-280(D) Series Auxiliary Power Units
Unsafe Condition: Auxiliary Power Units
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International (formerly AlliedSignal Inc.) 36-300(A), 36-280(B), and 36-280(D) Series Auxiliary Power Units
Airworthiness Directives; ESSEX PB&R CORPORATION (formerly E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company \\nIncorporated) PELS Model 4566M37B Crewmember Protective Breathing Equipment (PBE) Units
Unsafe Condition: Leakage of the PBE neck seal could compromise the crew's ability to combat an aircraft fire.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; ESSEX PB&R CORPORATION (formerly E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company \\nIncorporated) PELS Model 4566M37B Crewmember Protective Breathing Equipment (PBE) Units
Airworthiness Directives; GARRETT AUXILIARY POWER DIVISION Model GTCP 36-300 Auxiliary Power Units
Unsafe Condition: Damage to the titanium APU fire wall due to APU tieshaft separation, which could lead to a reduction in the fire protection capability of the APU compartment.
Why matched: Airworthiness Directives; GARRETT AUXILIARY POWER DIVISION Model GTCP 36-300 Auxiliary Power Units